Sunday, March 18, 2012

What to do for the second half of the semester?

Having just finished an essay on John Robbins, it is difficult to pull my mind out of the food industry and think of other topics for a final project. It is certainly possible to do something related. I could document my attempts or experience as I try to follow in the footsteps of current healthy eating concepts. Perhaps focus on the challenges of changing your diet (social pressure, inconvenience, giving up comfortable foods, ect.) and compare them to the benefits (or lack there of) of a different way of eating.

The problem with this idea is it is difficult to narrow down. Nutrition is by nature a holistic entity, but it is impossible to cover every angle in just a few weeks.

Other options may include breaking away from food. Perhaps I will take a critical stance at Subjective Reality by examining the philosophy of the Law of Attraction (popularize by The Secret). It would be interesting to tackle that from various perspectives, however that would likely be a more traditional, essay format.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Hypothetical Encounter With John Robbins


I sit patiently, waiting for him to arrive. The sun is bright; I shield my eyes as I look at the blue sky, then down again at the worn, outdoor table. I nervously shift in my chair, trying to remember the questions I had in mind to ask when I see him striding toward the table. His thinning hair is tousled by the breeze, but his gait is steady; although he is sixty years old, he displays a youthful energy as he reaches our meeting place, and his face creases with a smile as we make introductions.

I jump to my feet, eager to shake his hand. I notice his grip is strong, and his hands are both soft and healthy, as well as slightly calloused and weathered with age. Our order is taken, and I request only water, as I am uncomfortable making any of my usual food choices in the presence of one so diet and health oriented. The cold water is dull and fluorinated, obviously from a city tap, and we begin to discuss his views on health, diet, and the environment.

The conversation eases and I become less nervous as we become just two people discussing ideas, when we both notice a father with his young daughter at the ice cream shop across the street. We both notice the girl’s visible excitement as she receives her ice cream cone, no doubt a special treat for her. As she happily sits and enjoys her diary reward, I notice the discomfort on Robbins’ face.

I can see his pain, watching a father give his child something that represents, in Robbins’ opinion, a great danger to both her health and the environment. I see his desire to intervene, and try to inform the two of the dangers of such a habit. I watch him repress the desire, no doubt knowing from experience he would be entering into a rude and fruitless attempt at kindness that would be interpreted as a personal attack.

As we continue our conversation, I can hear the unease in his voice, noting the short, furtive glances across the street he attempts out of subtlety. I hear in his voice disappointment, a reluctant discipline to focus his mind on our conversation and not be distracted by such a potent example of what he is rallying against. As we make our goodbyes, I am struck by the compassion he still exhibits for the nameless little girl; his passion for spreading his message is curtailed by his common sense, and although he appears pleased with our interview, the scene we witnessed still seems to dwell on his mind as he makes his way quickly back through the crowd.

Saturday, February 18, 2012

John Robbins, My Public Intellectual Resources

John Robbins

  • Diet for a New America: ©1987
  • The Food Revolution: ©2001
    • Forward: Dean Ornish
      • "John Robbins has dedicated his life to the journey of trying to make the world a better place for the next generation. Sometimes, he is intentionally provocative in order to get out attention and to make a point. Whether or not we agree with everything in this book […] is less important than drawing our own conclusions based on the data and evidence that he and others provide."
    • "John Robbins has scored again. His writing style is engaging and sufficiently personal to make it MUST reading. And most importantly, he connects the dots that need connecting--environment personal health, societal economics, and personal meaning. Scientific researchers also would do well to read what Robbins says." Colin Campbell
  • Healthy at 100: ©2006
    • "John Robbins, once again, as in his brilliantly written earlier books, makes a strong connection between personal health and social consequences. Written by an author already famed for his courageous and well-researched writing, this book is a must-read for anyone concerned about health, be it planetary or personal." -T. Colin Campbell

Supplemental Materials:

  • Michael Pollan
    • The Omnivore's Dilemma ©2006
    • In Defense of Food ©2008
    • Food Rules ©2009
  • T. Colin Campbell, Thomas M. Campbell ©2004
    • Foreword: John Robbins
      • "TCS is extraordinarily helpful, superbly written and profoundly important. Dr. Campbell's work is revolutionary in its implications and spectacular in its clarity. I learned an immense amount from this brave and wise book. If you want to eat bacon and eggs for breakfast and then take cholesterol-lowering medication, that's your right. But if you want to truly take charge of your health, read TCS and do it soon! If you heed the counsel of this outstanding guide, your body will thank you every day for the rest of your life." - John Robbins.
    • "Everyone in the field of nutrition science stands on the shoulders of T. Colin Campbell, who is one of the giants in the field. This is one of the most important books about nutrition ever written--reading it may save your life." -Dr. Dean Ornish
  • Dean Ornish
    • The Spectrum ©2007

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Sacredness

I'd like to share a speech by Tim Minchin in his latest comedy special, Live at the O2

Warning: There is some vulgar language in this recording, which I am incapable of editing out.
If you are uncomfortable with obscenities please save everyone trouble by ignoring this post.

Sacred [Spoken Word] by Tim Minchin on Grooveshark

What strikes me most about this speech is that there is no punchline. There is no ending joke, no attempt to make this part funny (other than the humorous personality of the speaker). This is a man who stops in the middle of his largest comedy venue ever: a performance with an entire symphony orchestra in Royal Albert Hall, in London. That arena can hold 8,000 people.

So in front of 8,000 people who paid money to have a night of laughter, Tim just starts talking to them. He takes a sincere break from comedy, makes a point, and then returns to singing and making jokes.

Food for thought.

Considering Public Intellectuals

In considering public intellectuals for our upcoming midterm project, I can't help but wonder how to evaluate individuals who have a public voice; how do you draw the line between a popular blog, and a bohemian public intellectual?

While the reading we had assigned to us discusses the potential new "sub-categories" of public intellectuals, and perhaps their evolution from how they were previously defined, it is not very clear on how to make a decision whether or not a specific individual is a public intellectual or not. It concerned itself mostly with talking about the group as a whole, or rather as an abstract idea.

For example Steve Pavlina runs a blog which is followed by many people, citing over 2 million visits per month. He certainly has (in at least some form) the attentive public. That being said, his articles do not address the issues most people would consider public policy. His focus on personal development lends itself to many narratives, and although he references technical subjects such as psychology, quantum physics, and more with common vernacular, he does so in order to make points about the human condition, or abstract ideas of growth. Does this choice of topic mean he does not shape the public opinion and therefore is not a public intellectual? Also, by the definition on page one, a public intellectual is one who is "listened to be important sectors of the public". How to determine which sectors of the public a blogger is listened to is rather difficult, let alone deciding their importance.

This being said, he is certainly "broadly educated" and also "can speak on a myriad of topics". In addition, he is not affiliated with any academic organization, and has made it clear he is unafraid to publish opinions which are likely to (or even are designed to) offend some of the public: such as his post on 10 Reasons Not to Get a Job, or on Polyarmory. So he has certainly not succumb to pressures of any one institution.

So the real question boils down to: Does the topics on which an individual writes affect their status as a Public Intellectual? PI's are defined by writing on a wide range of topics, how that is not a specific measure of a person's writing. How can one decide what is a wide enough range? How can one decide what topics are considered to be in the public interest?

For now I leave these questions unanswered, however my decision on this topic will certainly be forthcoming.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Three things that stopped me in my tracks

Not much can stop me in my tracks; when something unexpected happens, or a crisis hits is when I tend to hit my stride and grow more efficient. Typically, what stops me in my tracks are realizations about myself, though with the blur of day to day life it can be difficult for me to recall them. Let us see what I remember.

1) The first thing I think about when I try to recall something that stopped me in my tracks is the first week of this semester, when I had to both rearrange my schedule, and plan my schedule for next year in order to take my math courses in the proper order. I found out that it is unavoidable for me to take an 8 AM class in order to complete my math major. This would be unfortunate for most people, but given my sleep disorder and my history of difficulties with early morning classes, it knocked me back a step. Most of the force came from the urgency that my decision had to be made by the end of the add/drop date; however the 8 AM shook me for another reason. It has taken me 5 semesters of classes that were somewhere between barely manageable and annoying, to reach this semester where I feel my classes actually fit well into a healthy schedule for me. Having to juggle a tough decision, possibly giving up something that finally worked well for me, and planning for my future forced me to pause and recollect myself.


2) Another thing which has stopped me in my tracks is when I choose to look at the back of my Zune HD. I had it engraved when I ordered it online with: “These are the Steps: Wish. Desire. Need. Achieve.” With the case on I often forget it is there, but occasionally I will remember, pull it out, and just look at it. I let my mind free and think of how that may apply to my life, and perhaps which step of the process I am currently in.

3) When else have I been stopped in my tracks? Well last year when I found out that my high school band director was retiring early it caused me to pause and contemplate. He very strongly believed in teaching more than just music, he tried very hard to teach every high school kid responsibility, respect, and so on. Hearing about his retirement caused me to think about that which I had learned from him, both directly and indirectly. During such a process, I call into question whether what I have learned is still helping me, is still useful. I question whether or not I should hold on to all of the beliefs instilled in me during my four years of high school band.

All three of these events are connected because they caused introspection. Something prompted me to rethink that which I normally assume to be fact, or at least assume to be relatively unchanging about myself. Whenever I take a step back, it is because I am questioning something I just then realized I had been taking for granted, and wish to examine whether my fleeting perception of said belief is accurate. This is true beyond even that which “stops me in my tracks.” Most events which are stressful, relieving, and especially challenging in my life center around my perception of myself, and whether or not I actually understand what is going on inside my own head.




This quote is about attitude. It's about taking what is undeniably the truth, and using your power as a human being to manage it correctly and achieve, or incorrectly and make excuses. It's also one of my new favorites.